Post #9709 by Lapsody on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (36)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 3

BHM: enough evidence? All the CNN article did was speculate in a different direction concerning what a few checks "truly" represented.

Hardly.

<snip>But banking records reviewed by CNN, which Comer’s committee possesses, provide substantial evidence in support of the Democrats’ assertions that there was indeed a $200,000 loan from Joe Biden to James Biden less than two months before the James Biden "loan repayment" check to Joe Biden for the same amount.<snip>

It isn't hard to read bank records, I've done it. So there is SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, not speculation done lightly - first. Second, there isn't anything that contradicts what ix written on the checks. All that is written by Comer - that there is a pattern that shows Biden knew, participated, and benefited hasn't been supported one bit. Not at all.

This is only a few checks:

May 26 From: Joe Biden To: Hunter Biden $200,000 Note: Loan
Aug 6 From: Hunter Biden To: Joe Biden $200,000 Note: Loan Repayment

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (36)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.