Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12) |
Author: ptheland 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: Trump's domestic army
Date: 08/05/25 6:18 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
IMHO, the Felon is poisoning ICE.

Yes. Further, I suspect ICE officers are also poisoning ICE. I haven't heard of mass resignations from ICE as their role has been expanded and detention quotas have been imposed. If there has been significant turnover, it hasn't made any news I can find. The little news I did find talked a bit about the difficulties in hiring new agents.

And that leads to:

The next POTUS should weed out the really bad agents

Is the culture at ICE one that rewards the bad agents (your "you have no rights" officers), basically turning the whole agency sour? I fear it may be. If so, ICE may need more than new leadership. It may need to be disbanded, just like the gestapo.

CBP may be suffering from the same issues. Just the initialisms - ICE and CBP - may be so damaged by the time the next POTUS takes office that the names can't be saved. All of DHS may need a broader reorganization. There are so many different agencies inside the department with police powers that it's easy to lose control of each little fiefdom in the Department.

I'm even slightly taken aback by the Department's name: Homeland security. It reminds me very much of things like the Fatherland and Motherland: names that put the country ahead of the individual. The most important part of this slightly crazy American Experiment is that the rights of the individual are raised and put ahead of the rights of the nation and state, with a few enumerated exceptions. So we don't protect the Mother/Father/Home land from the individual. We protect the individual from the government.

Right now, we're not doing a great job of that.

--Peter
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to ptheland here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community