Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1) |
Author: onepoorguy 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84346 
Subject: Fetterman
Date: 12/23/23 2:38 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
I'd heard the name, but don't really concern myself with PA politics. So didn't really know a lot about him (like he almost died from a stroke). Apparently both the extreme right and the extreme left want him dead. So he's probably my kinda guy!! ;-)

He is staunchly pro-Israel. In this article he doesn't say much about the Palestinians. I also have no sympathy for Hamas, and after 9/11 I was OK with the US blasting those who harbored the folks that were giving shelter to the enemy. So I get where Israel is coming from. At the same time, a lot of people who have no interest in politics or Hamas are dying. They just want to go about their lives unmolested. I don't know what to do about that, but we should at least acknowledge it.

nytimes.com - John fetterman progressive israel

“I don’t think it’s unreasonable to have a secured border,” Mr. Fetterman said in the interview, conducted over Zoom. “I would never put Dreamers in harm’s way, or support any kind of cruelty or mass expulsion of hundreds of thousands of people. But it’s a reasonable conversation to talk about the border.”

...

The Pennsylvania senator said he still aligns with many progressive goals, including a $15 minimum wage, universal health care, legalizing marijuana and abolishing the Senate filibuster.

But he said he no longer relates to the overarching label of “progressive” — especially as the left has become more interested in demanding what he described as “purity tests.”


Yeah...I think I may like this guy. I'm sure I won't agree with him about everything, but then I very seldom do with anyone.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to onepoorguy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (1) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community