It would take extra work for 1.4% added CAGR. Probably not worth the effort for me but for people doing automated trading it would be.
Over time an added 1.4% compounds to a big number; Wall Street heads have rolled for less than 1.4%

If the GTR1 backtests are right, we are talking about a screen that has long-term CAGR ranging from 22.9% to 26.8%.

Right there, that's a lot more than the S&P500's ~11.5%. So bumping that by 1.4% doesn't seem that big of a deal.

GTR1 for equal-weight SP500, 252 day hold is average 12.3% CAGR.

I am highly doubtful that this 22%+ CAGR is realistic going forward, because if true why hasn't it been arbitraged away? If Wall Street would kill for an extra 1.4% what would they do for an extra 10%?

"How often does this happen?"
Starting rank when held Frequency of early-sale trigger before next rebalance
#1 stock 6.8%
Top 5 holdings overall 11.9%
Top 10 holdings overall 14.8%
So best ranked stocks it is not very common.

Probably not worth it if it takes a lot of daily effort. It's just gilding the lily.

Top 10HTD12 shows avg CAGR 24.5% with AT 2.5
Top 5HTD12 shows 27.4%, with AT 1.8
Top 5HTD10 shows 27.1%, with AT 2.0
Top 5HTD15 shows 26.2%, with AT 1.6
Top 5HTD7 shows 25.8%, with AT 2.6

(I'm gonna have to look closely at that 5HTD12.)

==========================================
Here are a couple of top 10 lists, about a year apart.
Two things stand out.
There is a huge turnover in the top 10. There is a quick dropoff in the top ~5 and the dropoff flattens out after ~#6.
The first shows why this needs to be a monthly or bi-monthly screen.
The seconds shows why a large(ish) HTD works okay.

5/11/26	Ticker	Perf Year
1	SNDK	4048.26%
2	WDC	1073.30%
3	MU	811.36%
4	STX	768.04%
5	AMD	348.16%
6	LRCX	295.24%
7	AMAT	185.64%
8	MRVL	181.05%
9	KLAC	168.82%
10	GOOGL	158.31%

6/19/25	Ticker	Perf Year
1	APP	344.23%
2	AXON	163.67%
3	MSTR	146.75%
4	DASH	96.86%
5	NFLX	82.60%
6	GILD	66.00%
7	FTNT	65.88%
8	ZS	65.79%
9	SHOP	56.62%
10	MELI	51.87%