Post #41826 by Dope1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (112)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

Wouldn't have been any different if the bill had passed.

Had the bill passed and Trump lost, we'd have a vastly different situation down on the border.

The bill didn't restrict Trump (or any future President) from doing anything, and didn't lock in 5K/day as permitted or authorized or anything.

It didn't. That's true.
All it did was aim to give Biden and future dem Presidents air cover to keep the floodgates open.

You didn't dodge anything, except solutions. Because there wasn't any actual substantive problem with the bill - it didn't restrict the enforcement ability of the President, only added to it.

I've covered this. Biden and Harris never had any intention of doing anything along the border other than accelerating the flow of people over it.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (112)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.