Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (59) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: What sticks in my gullet
Date: 08/06/24 5:14 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 6
As has been pointed out already, most tipped jobs have pretty low pay, even with the tips. Some tipped employees would see a benefit. Many would not.

I'm not so sure about that. Median annual income of a waiter/waitress in the U.S. is north of $29K (at least by one source - it varies somewhat) which is comfortably above the standard deduction. Many (most?) of those folks will qualify for the EITC, and many (most?) will have an EITC that's higher than the amount of taxes they owe - but exempting tipped income from taxation would still benefit them.

money.usnews.com - Waiter and waitress

I'm pushing back on this not to be pedantic, but because I think that Democrats are still reluctant to see the threat that Republican populism poses for their coalition. The corporate/fiscal conservative faction has lost most of its ascendancy that it enjoyed as part of the Reagan (and Thatcher) realignment. It was a nice forty years while it lasted (for them), but right-wing parties all over the West have moved away from austerity (or even faux austerity) programs into full on populism. Democrats don't want to believe that this new populism is real, because if the GOP can pivot away from the Grover Norquist/Paul Ryan "let's cut all the popular governmental services" wing of the party, it's hard to see how the Democrats win elections.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (59) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community