Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", sykesix asked the members: "What do you do if you arrive early at movie besides go to the snack bar?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (97) |
Author: albaby1 ✶❂🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 88909 
Subject: Re: Brexit Bullies
Date: 10/26/26 1:17 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 11
Who happen to share the same ideology, tactics, etc. etc. etc.

Yes! You'll notice that there are numerous different terrorist groups out in the Middle East, for example, that share similar ideology and tactics. That aren't cells of the same larger group, but are completely discrete and independent organizations - that in fact are sometimes bitter enemies of each other. They're using the same "playbook," because there's a common set of strategies and tactics that are effective within the resources of these types of groups. But that in no way means they're part of some larger group.

To give you yet another analogy, go into a major metro and look at all the various street gangs that are there - and you'll find that they tend to have a lot of similarities. They'll share the same general goals, the same general organizational structure, the same tactics. They're not at all "cells" of some larger uber-Street Gang - in fact, they often are very much antagonistic towards each other. They end up mimicking each other and converging on many of the same features anyway.

Now you're just lurching into being insulting. I've humored several threads' worth of this plus cheap debate tricks from you; that's done now.

It's not insulting. You're taking two positions that are inconsistent with each other. On the one hand, you're claiming that these various Antifa groups are "cells" of something, that they're analogous to the cell structure that other larger organizations (like the IRA, or as I have mentioned al-Qaeda) sometimes use. On the other hand, you're acknowledging that there isn't a larger organization, and that there isn't the Antifa version of a Kevin McKenna or Osama bin Laden or Bakr al-Bagdadi.

Those are incoherent positions. It sounds like it's very frustrating for you, but it's this very inconsistency that made Trump's mis-statement on this point a mis-statement. You can designate the IRA a terrorist organization, but you can't designate Irish Republicanism as a terrorist organization - and if one tries to do the latter, it will reveal a serious lack of comprehension about what Irish Republicanism and the IRA actually are. The latter is an organization, and the former is an idea.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 88,852 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (97) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community | Privacy