Post #12652 by Dope1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (164)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

So do you support massively expanding the immigration court system?

I merely point to the WaPo editorial to buttress my point about the system being gamed.

If immigrants' asylum claims are heard quickly - within months, rather than years - then these issues disappear. Asylees with valid claims don't have to spend years in limbo; asylees with invalid claims get adjudicated quickly and don't get to stay for very long - perhaps even a short enough period that they can be detained for most of it.

Any objection to that?

As long as it's a valid claim...and we place a limit on how many we accept.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (164)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.