Post #51205 by Dope1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (160)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 3

You can't deduce an answer. With only two items in the comparison, there's a very good chance - indeed a likelihood - that the reason for the difference is not due to the general category of health care systems in the country, but instead may be due to the particulars of the UK specifically.

I’m not the one positing that UHC is so great and every other civilized country has it (ergo, we suck for not having it).

Therefore…comparisons on critical services are 100% fair game.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (160)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.