Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13) |
Author: Goofyhoofy 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 48473 
Subject: Re: From Jeff Tiedrich
Date: 03/07/2024 2:03 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
Oh, it's not about the length of the terms. It's how often you have elections. We have elections every two years, so the leadership will only serve for two years

Why is that? Right now leadership serves for two years, and then is re-elected if the bloc wants him/her to continue. If the term limits were, say, 12 years, you could have 6 years in the House, and you could be House Leader for as many of those as you could be elected to by your peers.

I am against the accumulation of entrenched power by, say, McConnell or Pelosi. There are some seats which are “safe”, and thereby guarantee longevity. The leadership should turn over more frequently to give other states and leaders the opportunity to do things in a different way. No, I really don’t want Byrd to serve for 51 years just because he happens to come from a rock solid state that will never offer an alternative on <[whatever the issue is]>.

More turnover isn’t a bug, it’s a feature. It should be used more frequently, not less.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds