Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (38) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: Is This Fascism?
Date: 11/29/23 11:37 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
Orange Jesus went on to say that the "government" should come down hard on MSNBC and make them pay for their illegal political activity. By describing their coverage as "illegal," isn't he implying he will criminally prosecute the station and its reporters?

And isn't that, well, fascism?


I don't think so.

One of Trump's rhetorical techniques is to try to delegitimize all criticisms of him. People who criticize him are disloyal, hypocritical, are breaking the law, or are interfering with the election. Anyone doing anything that might negative affect his chances of winning the election are "interfering" with the election, even though the essence of political campaigning involves millions of people doing things that will affect the outcome of the election in small or big ways.

But him calling for the government to enforce the laws against stations isn't fascism. Because the stations aren't doing anything illegal, enforcing the laws against the stations won't result in prosecutions. This is no more fascism than the occasional calls among certain ill-informed progressives to try to pull various Fox stations' broadcast licenses because they are spreading "election disinformation" or whatever:

axios.com - Advocates ramp up pressure on fcc to revoke fox tv license

....and no more likely to result in any actual government action.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (38) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community