Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9) |
Author: AdrianC   😊 😞
Number: of 4460 
Subject: A Bursting Bubble Would Be Great for A.I.
Date: 12/05/25 7:54 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0
Gifted:
A Bursting Bubble Would Be Great for A.I.
nytimes.com - AI bubble innovation advancement

Large language models, for all their wonders, can only predict the next thing a human would say. Train one on texts from the late 1800s and it won’t invent airplanes or rockets. It will channel ideas from that period, when leading scientists thought human flight was impossible. If we only scale up our current approach, wasting money on fast-obsolete chips and energy-guzzling data centers, we won’t progress beyond our current technology, which still yields limited, mediocre results.

Better A.I. would remember what it learns, just as humans do, and squeeze more work from each watt. Tech companies spend billions of dollars running large language models that don’t learn while they run. A tool that does both simultaneously would come closer to approximating the human brain, allowing it to innovate more readily.


Is that really how they work? If they can hold a conversation, they must remember what was said previously.

I tried using Perplexity for a programming problem I had. It faithfully reproduced what the equipment manufacturer's manuals said, and collected it in a nice, easy to read format. Yeah, not useful. I'd already read the manual before I consulted Perplexity. I guess I could have saved time by finding out a bit quicker that the manual was wrong.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to AdrianC here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,453 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community