Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search MI
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search MI


Investment Strategies / Mechanical Investing
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7) |
Author: platykurtic   😊 😞
Number: of 3959 
Subject: Re: IB Transaction Cost Analysis
Date: 01/01/2024 4:00 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
Isn't the Friction that's relevant the 'difference between the final transaction cost & the price that the backtester (for example GTR1) uses'? That is the difference between the transaction price including fees, taxes etc. & the day's closing price in the case of the GTR1.

That's one of the reasons why I've always favored the MOC (market on close) transaction type at IB for MI work. In that case the friction is essentially IB's fees only x2 which is lower than the traditional 0.4% friction. And of course if one could reliably transact at 'better than the close' pricing then friction could even be negative.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7) |


Announcements
Mechanical Investing FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds