Post #41820 by albaby1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (112)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 10

Oh, yes we did. Because now the first problem of 5k/day is down to about 22/day.

Wouldn't have been any different if the bill had passed. The bill didn't restrict Trump (or any future President) from doing anything, and didn't lock in 5K/day as permitted or authorized or anything.

The only difference would have been that there would be more ICE agents, more detention space, and more court throughput.

You didn't dodge anything, except solutions. Because there wasn't any actual substantive problem with the bill - it didn't restrict the enforcement ability of the President, only added to it.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (112)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.