Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (36) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84346 
Subject: Re: The Problem With Polymarket
Date: 10/18/24 3:16 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
He will likely fill his cabinet and other appointed position with loyalists who will do his bidding no matter what. The USSC has given him wide latitude to ignore the law.

That all leads to Trump being able to remain in power after 2028 if he chooses to do so.


I'm curious...how would that work?

I mean, the federal government doesn't run our elections. So it's mid 2027, and various candidates start making preparations for the 2028 elections, and Trump just...announces there won't be an election next year? Is the idea that all the states would just listen to him, and not hold their normal nominating contests for the Presidency? His cabinet and other appointed positions, whether filled with loyalists or not, don't really have a say in whether those primaries happen or not.

Or suppose he doesn't cancel the elections, but says he's going to run again. Are all the states going to let him, in violation of the Constitution? If they did, when the inevitable court challenges come, would the courts - even the SCOTUS - be willing to go along with that? He lost all his court cases last time, and he's not likely to have too many new allies on the bench than in late 2020.

The fact that the states each run their own elections can be incredibly frustrating at times, but it does present obstacles to the President or the Executive trying to run roughshod over the elections process. Trump has a lot of influence with state election officials, and I don't mean to diminish that - but having a cabinet and federal government filled with lackeys doesn't give him control over the elections process the way it would in most other countries.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (36) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community