Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (127) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84350 
Subject: Re: Texiera on what the d's should do
Date: 03/26/25 2:27 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 14
30 minutes. Partners had been notified, so the word was already out.

Two hours. Thirty minutes before the first planes took off, but two hours before the actual attack. If the Houthis had obtained that information when Hegseth posted it, they would have had two hours to prepare their response.

Uh, huh.

Of course. If you tell them at 11:45 that at 1:45, the U.S. intends to drop bombs in an effort to kill a high-value Terrorist that they anticipate will be at a known location, that gives them two hours for their high-value personnel to just....move to someplace they aren't at now and generally don't frequent. Which would probably destroy the mission, because whoever was being targeted wouldn't be anywhere we anticipated. To say nothing of whatever defensive countermeasures they could have put in place before the actual strike took place...again, two hours after the message was posted.

He's mostly going to be mad about the reporter being added, which never should have happened.

And wouldn't have happened if Hegseth hadn't dumped all that information onto Signal, rather than using a more secure means of communication. The problem isn't just that Waltz made a mistake in adding someone to the chat group - it's that using a Signal chat group makes the communications vulnerable to being accessed by outside people in a way that more secure communications platforms are not. It's not a safe platform to discuss classified information like this. There's no earthly reason for Hegseth to be putting that kind of information onto a commercial messaging app in the first place.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (127) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community