Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (102) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84362 
Subject: Re: As Albaby says...
Date: 01/13/26 9:44 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 10
And yet, that point does not and cannot exist in a vacuum…hence my point.

But your point is wrong.

No, not that there are serious geopolitical implications to Russia and China having influence in South America. Nor that it's supremely important for the U.S. to try to limit their influence.

It's your suggestion that the people on this board don't realize that.

Of course we do. These critiques of the Administration's plans are not critiques of their objectives. We're just noting that the things they're doing are not likely to achieve those objectives. So when you write:

We should just let China, Iran and Russia have a base there. They can run drugs, have terrorism base, Chinese listening posts and work to destabilize other countries in South America.

Sometime there are bigger things at stake. Maybe one day this board figures it out.


...it's just totally off base. We know there are important things at stake in Venezuela. What we're saying is that what the Administration actually did isn't likely to have any material impact on those things. Venezuela has been allies with China and Russia, and not the U.S., because it is a socialist dictatorship that represses human rights and expropriated tens of billions of dollars in assets from American companies and which regime draws enormous domestic political value from being antagonistic to the U.S. After the removal of Maduro, Venezuela is now a socialist dictatorship that represses human rights and expropriated tens of billions of dollars in assets from American companies and which regime draws enormous domestic political value from being antagonistic to the U.S. While Maduro is gone, none of the things that kept Venezuela in the Sino-Russia sphere of influence have changed.

It would be interesting to hear why you think this operation will actually lead to a material change in Venezuela - to hear you address the point we're actually making - rather than keep asserting that we're missing the point on how important China is. We know how important China is. We just don't think that this action materially affects Venezuela's posture via China.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (102) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community