Bad enough that you guys misattribute to people on a message board, but deliberately misattributing a legal holding to the Supreme Court,

Actually, the Supreme Court did say it was OK to use ethnicity as part of a reason for stopping someone for ICE purposes for a time by not upholding the restraining order until the appeals is decided. This can be viewed as a signal that ethnicity as a big part of stopping someone is not viewed unfavorably by the court. Why? Among the factors that the court would use to decide is the damage to citizenry if they are stopped using ethnicity as a large basis of the profiling. It appears that the damage is not enough to support a TRO until it's decided. I view it as the court indicating that if a good case is brought before them, they will eliminate or lower Significantly the prohibition on racial and ethnic profiling.

And no, your question was a gotcha.