Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", sykesix asked the members: "What do you do if you arrive early at movie besides go to the snack bar?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (10) |
Author: albaby1 ✶❂🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 88907 
Subject: Re: Nuclear War Unthinkable??
Date: 11/10/26 12:56 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 14
Thanks to voters electing democrats - who are more than willing to shoot the United States in the crotch to spite Trump - the Iranians have some leverage now in the form of a democrat Congress that will do anything to make Trump look bad.

The Iranians have always had leverage. It's just that Hegseth and Trump didn't see it. They thought military superiority would achieve our goals, but that was a mistake. Iran always had a response to us trying to force them to agree to never have a nuclear weapon to any greater degree and in any greater way than they had previously agreed to. They could always drive up gas prices. The American people don't want higher gas prices, so they voted (in part) to get a different Congress. Not because the voters wanted to shoot the U.S. in the crotch to spite Trump or to make Trump look bad, but because they want the conflict to be over so that gas prices will fall again.

Trump, foolishly, did not take into account that the Iranians would attack energy infrastructure in the area as a potential response. He says that he took into account that any military attack would disrupt traffic in the Strait, but it's not clear that they formulated any response that could solve that reaction. Iran always had the leverage of forcing us to accept high gas and oil prices as the cost for trying to force them to make a different deal than they had before, and they've been exercising that leverage very adroitly. Hence, the "driver's seat" comment.

We always have the ability to maintain this status quo - inflicting significant harm on their economy, but not getting any closer to Iran agreeing to different terms than they were willing to agree to before the war. And Iran has the ability to maintain it as well. A dictatorial regime can last for a very long time while impoverishing its people (see North Korea, Cuba).
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 88,852 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (10) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community | Privacy