Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (38) |
Author: Lambo 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: No 'Hamilton' at the Kennedy Center
Date: 12/29/25 8:57 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 8

And you praise that Dope, you exalt it. Goebbels w

Only one side on this board does that…and it’s not mine.

That’s twice you’ve done this. Strike 3 means the Kraken gets unleashed.


Goebbels it is Dope. Release your Kraken threat. And I have no idea what you mean with "twice", that's ambiguous, maybe you should explain what "this" is.

Me: Who fears investigation of their actions? Trump at the moment - afraid of the Epstein papers. And because Freedom of Speech exists in tension with other rights that protect reputations against injurious falsehoods, for one, Trump sues, not protect his sordid reputation, but to suppress other's speech.

And you praise that Dope, you exalt it. Goebbels would be proud.


Are you trying to tell me that the Dems and liberals on this board are praising Trump for suing to suppress people's speech? Don't think anyone buys that. You have praised and were happy with Trump's suits against others. The only thing you ever showed hesitancy on was tariffs, and you abandoned that hesitancy.

We do praise people like E Jean Carrol, because that really took a lot for her to be willing to go through that against a powerful and popular person like Trump. Central Park 5? About time. NYT, etc.? Have at it. BBC? The overwhelming legal opinion is that it's another meritless case. And you're out here arguing that Trump's attempt to overturn the election was justified using hyperbolic mischaracterization(s) about some clerical procedural errors? Screw you and your Kraken threats. Free Speech.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Lambo here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (38) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community