Post #28698 by bighairymike on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (58)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

Trump is hands down preferable to Liz Cheney. - bhm

I disagree.

But since the choice is between Trump and Harris, it doesn’t really address the central question of this election, and that is, who will do a better job of defending the national security interests of the United States, and that person is not the former president who displayed an appalling ignorance of even what the national security interests of the United States consist of. - Bill.

-----------------

You are right that the issue is who will do a better job of defending the national security interests of the United States, and we can disagree over that. So why is your side bringing up baby sitting prowess as a criteria?

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (58)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.