Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |
Author: Steve203 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84362 
Subject: Re: 17D chess
Date: 04/25/26 2:37 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7

Remember all the threats by Trump the Conqueror, because a Chinese company had the contracts to operate the ports at both ends of the Canal?

Here's something of a time line wrt the Canal.

February 27, 2026

Panama’s comptroller announced it was starting an audit of the Panama Ports Co. concession on Jan. 20, 2025 the day of Trump’s inauguration. Two weeks later, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio arrived and made clear that a Chinese company operating the ports was unacceptable to Washington. He suggested that China could obstruct canal traffic if it wanted to.

On July 30, 2025, the comptroller said he was filing a complaint with the Supreme Court asking that the concession be found unconstitutional. The court announced its decision finding it was unconstitutional at the end of January 2026.

The government’s seizure of the ports this week set off another round of objections. Mulino said it was necessary to ensure their continuing operation and to determine their real value.


ca.finance.yahoo.com - Panama canal ports dragged

Recall, Maduro was snatched on January 3. The Panamanian President sees what happens to heads of state that don't "play ball" with the US regime. The Panamanian court rules on January 29.

The US State Department is pleased.

Nations Support Panamanian Rule of Law

The undersigned nations take note of Panama’s Supreme Court decision to declare CK Hutchison’s concession of the Balboa and Cristobal ports unconstitutional. We respect the ruling as residing squarely within the purview of Panama’s independent judicial system, which upholds the rule of law and demonstrates Panama’s status as a mature democracy.


state.gov - Nations support panamanian rule of law

Then, the Panamanian government ordered the seizure of the ports on February 23rd, handing over operations to Maersk and MSC.

With the head of the Venezuelan regime, and operations of the Canal, in his pocket, Trump the Conqueror started bombing Iran on Feb 28, drawing the inevitable closure of Hormuz, making the operations in Venezuela and Panama, quickly, and richly, pay off.

17D chess in operation.

Steve

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Steve203 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community