Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (52) |
Author: marco100   😊 😞
Number: of 77802 
Subject: Re: Step one, complete
Date: 01/19/26 4:14 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
Dope1,

I have to disagree with the notion that the DOJ was EVER "independent." (I'm not saying you believe that but why even concede that it should be?)

That's just malarkey when for example Biden wants his DOJ to do something but giving the President some measure of plausible deniability.

DOJ is not independent, it can't be, and it shouldn't be. The Attorney General is a member of the President's candidate and answers directly to Presidential authority.

DOJ just like every other part of the Executive branch is not, never was, never was intended to be, and never will be--and should NOT be--"independent" of Presidential control.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (52) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds