Post #30988 by PinotPete on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (34)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 3

That’s not supposed to make a difference, but I am among those who have lost some faith in the courts’ ability to act impartially.

Me, too. Me, too. But...

I's one thing to go back on precedent such as Roe v. Wade with the Dobbs decision; seems quite a step to go back on one's own decision, which in Thomas', Alito's, and Robert's case was actually much more strongly worded against recess appointments than the moderate wing's majority opinion.

Could happen, of course, but this kind of backtracking would be quite the next step in court partisanship and something we haven't seen yet.

Yet.

Pete

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (34)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.