Post #1320 by elann on the Mechanical Investing board

Shrewd'm.com

A merry & shrewd investing community

Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!

Search MI

Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!

Search MI

You can ignore authors, whether they are producing too much noise or being needlessly provocative, by clicking the yellow unhappy when reading their post.

- Manlobbi

Investment Strategies / Mechanical Investing

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (32)

Prev | Next

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 6

Interesting theory. If this is true, it seems we should see evidence that screens that performed well in backtest at deeper/larger numbers of holds (say holding 30-40 stocks) have continued to perform well in forward test.

Many if not most of the previously tested screens would not qualify for such a test because they have a final sorting step for top 10.

Elan

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (32)

Prev | Next

Announcements

Mechanical Investing FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Ticker or Board Name Author

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.