Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MIBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MIBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Investment Strategies / Mechanical Investing
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (16) |
Author: mungofitch 🐝🐝🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 6131 
Subject: Re: 135% return on mungofitch's "esoteric op
Date: 12/19/24 10:27 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 17
Um, simply buying and holding SPY since that date in 2020 would have resulted in a 154% gain.

I don't doubt your figure. But you would have had to put up the cash to buy SPY. The futures contracts have a lot of built in leverage, and have been in a profitable situation almost since the post, so one's account cash balance would have been rising along the way. That cash in turn could have been earning money in other ways during the interval.

Not to mention that current S&P valuation levels would not have been predicted by any sane person. Outliers are not the norm : ) In the last few years almost any investment strategy looked dumb compared to holding the S&P. Sadly that wasn't knowable in advance.

Speaking of knowable in advance, here's a fun observation:
Imagine a die-hard old-skool MI fan restarted YLDEARNYEAR 1-10 monthly in April 2020 after the pandemic dip.
First year: beat the S&P by 28.5%
Second year: beat the S&P by 18.6%
Third year: beat the S&P by 32.6%
Fourth year: beat the S&P by 8.1% *

Overall four-year CAGR for the strategy: 42.6% versus S&P 20.1%.
Presumably with a lot less risk of permanent capital loss: all the firms purchased have high earnings and high dividends.

Jim

* (one month of data missing, I used the S&P return that month as a proxy)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to mungofitch here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 6,115 posts about Mechanical Investing. The article-length ones it recommended most:
Dividend investing · 52 recs · 2025
Non-Mag7 screen · 34 recs · 2025
OT - Div yields and returns · 32 recs · 2024
Using AI to generate backtesting programs · 30 recs · 2025
Rankings for 19Dec2022 · 29 recs · 2022
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (16) |


Announcements
Mechanical Investing FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community