Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (17) |
Author: lizgdal   😊 😞
Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: the meaning of 'and'
Date: 10/03/23 7:43 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0
In the 100 minutes of discussion in this Supreme Court case yesterday, the words 'logic' and 'parenthesis' were never said. In contrast, 'em dash' was said 15 times.

count      word
0 logic
0 parenthesis
13 grammar
15 em dash
18 language


The English language is imprecise and ambiguous. Common sense is used to figure out meaning, and sometimes people disagree on what a sentence means. Maybe this is a feature not a bug. I'm fine with this approach to the law, but prefer using logic myself because I am more comfortable with math than with grammar.

But this particular law seems to be a grammatical mistake, and the Supreme Court justices struggled to find the meaning. Congress should just fix the law. One version uses 'or' and an alternate version uses 'and'. Vote for one or the other.

"JUSTICE ALITO: Well, just out of curiosity, I wonder if I can ask you a question about how you think language works in general. Let's just forget about special rules that apply to statutory interpretation for a moment and just talk about how language works in general and your understanding of that. If I say something and it's ambiguous and you're trying to figure out whether I mean A or B, to what degree do you take into account whether A or B makes more sense?"
supremecourt.gov - Argument transcripts
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to lizgdal here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (17) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community