Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (28) |
Author: Umm 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84357 
Subject: Re: Drought in the Colorado R. watershed
Date: 08/11/26 1:04 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
"Malthus was right. It's not a question of if, only when we will destroy our ability to live on this planet if we do nothing to avoid it"

Malthus was an idiot Doomer that history has already demonstrated to be hilariously wrong. Malthus essays stated that human population grows exponentially while food supply increases only linearly. That turned out to be way wrong in that our ability to feed ourselves has more than kept up with the amount we breed). He ignored things like technological advances (we have become much better at growing food) as well as cultural transitions (i.e. birth rates drop as standards of living and educational levels grew).

Humankind is most certainly not out breeding our ability to sustain ourselves. Malthus was as wrong as could be.

As for destroying our ability to live on this planet, that is a whole other topic which is much more worriesome than having too many people on the planet. Unfortunately human ingenuity works both ways. Humankind has figured out ways to completely destroy the planet and make it uninhabitable to more than a handful of humans at one persons, Putin, could effectively make large portions of the planet uninhabitable to humans by launching all of Russia's nuclear missiles. Even if the U.S. didn't respond, Russia has enough nukes that almost all of the surface could be rendered inhabitable by either direct strikes or by the fallout from the nuclear winter that would result. That wasn't what Malthus was talking about.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Umm here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (28) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community