Post #17711 by bighairymike on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

exactly as I wrote up thread: Daniels "illustrated the nature of the story and exactly why the campaign wanted to suppress the fact that candidate Trump, age 60, was raw-dogging a porn star, age 27, - CO

-------------------------

Or alteratively,

Daniels "illustrated the nature of the story and exactly why the Husband wanted to suppress the fact that husband Trump, age 60, was raw-dogging a porn star, age 27,

And BTW, Stormy did not need to go into all that salacious detail to establish the fact that she and Trump had sex. All the x-rated detail was allowed as in testimony purely to embarrass Trump and bias the jury as it had no bearing on the evidence of the bookkeeping crime.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.