Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (58) |
Author: onepoorguy 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84346 
Subject: Re: Trump: Forget POWs, They Deserve It
Date: 10/23/24 3:08 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
Trump's pitch as a candidate is that it's a coarse world filled with bastards, that a lot of those bastards are not just foreign enemies but domestic elites that want to take advantage of "us," and that it takes a hardened and coarse son-of-a-bitch to put all those bastards in their place. That's why, I think, the message that Harris was sending earlier was so effective - it framed Trump as dumb and weird and goofy, which is the opposite of what he wanted to spin.

Agree on the "domestic elites", but not sure I agree on the foreign enemies (except for those attempting to cross the border to claim asylum).

He showed little interest in the "coarse bastards" when he was in-office, and I haven't seem him talk about that much as a candidate. Which is consistent with my observation that he is, at heart, an isolationist. He just doesn't care about anything beyond our borders, and questions why we should expend any resources beyond our borders. He doesn't understand why Ukraine is a "thing", doesn't seem to care about the South China Sea, has stated he doesn't think NATO is a big deal, etc. Which is a legitimate position to hold (i.e. isolationism), even if it is naive and stupid, and historically didn't end well the last time we pursued it.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to onepoorguy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (58) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community