Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (22) |
Author: ptheland 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84362 
Subject: Re: ….but here we are
Date: 10/25/24 8:41 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
Who exactly has to authorize an ex president to talk to foreign leaders?

Only the sitting US President may set US foreign policy, which is generally through the State Department and with some oversight from Congress. Not an ex-President. Not a candidate for President.

Everyone is more than welcome to express their opinion on foreign affairs. Any candidate for President should be ready, willing, and able to discuss what they would do if elected. But no one outside of the current administration may actually conduct foreign affairs.

So the real question boils down to what Trump talked about with these foreign leaders. If he were negotiating with these foreign leaders about the US policies he would implement and asking for what they would offer in return, that's an illegal conduct of foreign affairs. On the other hand, if he were hosting something like a birthday party that had lots of attendees and no private meetings with the leader, that would be fine. The problem is that these were private meetings AND we don't know what he talked about. I'm not aware of any transcripts or summaries of the discussions at these meetings. And based on his history, it is not at all unreasonable to ask if he were conducting foreign affairs. Trump has no filters that would prevent him from breaking the law as long as he felt it would be in his best interest to do so. His own account of the meetings is simply unreliable, as he lies almost as often as he breathes.

Did he engage in an illegal conduct of foreign affairs? We just don't know clearly one way or the other. It's not clear that he did, and it's not clear that he didn't. Hence the suspicion and questions about the meetings.

--Peter
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to ptheland here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (22) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community