Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84350 
Subject: Re: the price of peace
Date: 05/25/26 1:00 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 6
Let the price of gas soar so high, the USian Sheeple will be willing to accept a full on ground invasion, so they can feed their SUVs, without taking out a mortgage on their house.

I mean - can anyone really think that would be the outcome? That if gas prices spike above $5.02 (the Biden-era high) or even higher, that it would increase U.S. support for more military action in the Middle East?

I mean, the far more likely reaction is the opposite. If gas prices spike because of the war, it will get the American people to demand that the war end. Not escalate. The Administration would have to know that a massive ground troop deployment to Iran would result in a barrage of missiles blowing up the gas and oil fields in Qatar, Kuwait, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia - to say nothing of the destruction of Iran's energy infrastructure. If the American people are unhappy about inflation and gas prices before such an assault, they'll be livid staring down the barrel of 3-5 years of high gas prices because the U.S. and Iran blew up all the energy production in the Gulf.

I think that's exceptionally unlikely. The Administration would never get authorization from Congress for a ground invasion, and (more relevant) they'd never get the money from Congress for a ground invasion. Because even though Trump doesn't have to stand for election again, everyone else in the GOP does - and they're not going to have the votes to let him start Iraq 2.0.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community