Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", sykesix asked the members: "What do you do if you arrive early at movie besides go to the snack bar?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (16) |
Author: Goofyhoofy ✸✹🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 88904 
Subject: Re: Racist ad
Date: 10/26/26 2:45 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
I refuse to watch Fox Sports unless they apologize for running the racist ad

Just for the record, stations are not allowed to censor, reject, or modify political ads in nearly all cases. There is legislation to that effect, and the FCC is similarly proscribed from taking action against a station even if the ad contains lies, profanity, or would in any other way run afoul of FCC regulations.

It’s the “no censorship” mandate and it’s been in place for decades. Originally it covered only over-the-air broadcast stations, but has been expanded to include all such ads on cable (and perhaps streaming, IDK.)

It’s also worth mentioning that stations were required to charge candidates the lowest possible rate for a candidate’s advertising (whatever the lowest rate was they sold to *any* advertiser including huge “bulk” buys in the preceding 90 days) and the USSC just “expanded” that to include any advertising on behalf of a candidate (although that is not written anywhere in the law. Another case of “this is what we want, and never mind all that stuff about ‘literal interpretation’ of the law.) That, of course, opened the floodgates for PACs and other interested parties to engage in all sorts of foolishness.

Note that if a candidate wants to advertise and you’re sold out, you have to bump one of your long standing advertisers to make room. It’s nice when the politicians write the rules to suit themselves, eh?
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Goofyhoofy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 88,852 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (16) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community | Privacy