Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12) |
Author: wzambon 🐝 BRONZE
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84346 
Subject: Re: FAA’s Sean Duffey
Date: 02/08/25 12:19 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
Tell me you don't know anything about engineering without telling me you don't know anything about engineering.

What aspect of what I said would be better understood by an engineer?

Maybe we hire more ATCs?

Do you mean instead of offering buyouts to the ones who still remain? Then I agree. But what does that have to do with Elon Musk? That’s not an engineering problem.

Musk wants to impose his own plan to automate the air traffic control system. I have no problem with that as an intermediate to long range goal. But I don’t want Elon anywhere close to that. For one thing, he’d be on both sides of the government/contractor issue- a ginormous red flag for fraud. But most importantly, Elon has an experimental history rife with spectacular explosions of rockets and cars.

It can be argued that such is the progression of applied science, and that would be true. Another way of putting that is “We learn by our mistakes” and that is true as well. But Elon is cooking up a revolutionary scheme to automate our entire system of air traffic control- of taking humans out of the equation.

And I agree with that long term vision. It would be an engineering marvel.


But not at the price of a few, spectacular mid-air collisions. Elon would view that as simply the price to be paid for the advance of science (and his bottom line)

Caution and step by step advance is called for. NOT Elon’s usual mode of operations that is on full display at the moment-slash and burn the existing structure to the ground, then replace it with the new (untested) solution after the old system lies in smoking ruins.


Baby steps are called for if you want to automate air traffic control, Dope.

And Elon has never been one to tip toe through a technological minefield.

The price of one single slip up will not be a single rocket or Tesla, but will be human lives measured possibly in the hundreds.


Has Elon Musk ever shown any regard for the price that others pay to realize his dreams?


The FAA has been trying to train/hire more air traffic controllers for years. Trump and Elon have only made that problem worse.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to wzambon here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community