If you want to pay a ton of money to detain people while they're awaiting their hearings, though, that's certainly a choice that Congress could make - but it's not one that's necessary to follow the law. - Albaby

You don't want them deported without a hearing

You won't fund the additional resources to provide detention and hearings.

The only alternative your lease us with is to release them onto the streets where that can continue preying on citizens. That is simply unacceptable, so default appears to be accept the crime or deport them immediately. Our system was not designed to handle the volumes we find ourselves stuck with. We cannot afford to be held hostage to an inadequate process. Normally such an issue would be resolved through bipartisan legislation. The dems have ruled out that option so here we are.

I don't like the present process either but it is better than releasing dangerous criminals into our communities. Keep deporting until a better solution comes along.

Lastly, there needs to be a re-calibration of judicial authority where a single lower court activist judge can exercise authority over any aspect of Article 2 powers of the Executive. Especially when the tactic is to issue a TRO and then take months to resolve the issue. This completely undermines the President

US Policy FAQ

---

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.