Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (133) |
Author: marco100   😊 😞
Number: of 84359 
Subject: Re: The Affordability Tour Kicks Off
Date: 12/17/25 1:51 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
50% of all health care dollars are consumed by 5% of the population.

The top 1% of health care dollar consumers consume 21% of health care dollars (according to a recent analysis by Kaiser Foundation).

This is at heart an economics problem. A basic economics problem.

Scarce resources are valuable and the scarcer they are, the more valuable they become.

The poorer our general level of health becomes, the scarcer this resource becomes, hence the more valuable/more expensive.

Lots of people don't seem to grasp that there is not an infinite supply of health care.

And therefore, it must be rationed. The question is what mix of private market/public market is optimal.

Not: "Everyone can have infinite unlimited health care for no or very low cost."

People continue to confuse "government funded" (i.e. funded by taxpayers) with "free."

People DO NOT want to pay for their own health care. ANY of it.

They have somehow come to believe, or been led to believe, that it should be "free." Or close to "free."

But they don't want to give up their Twinkies. They don't want to exercise. They don't want to stop taking drugs and stop drinking and stop indulging in inherently dangerous activities.

And they certainly don't want any limitation at all on medical care for MawMaw and PawPaw.

They whine because they have a high deductible plan. As if the purpose of insurance is not fundamentally to protect against catastrophic events which would bankrupt you, but rather, it should pay for your ordinary predictable medical care.

They want their auto insurance to cover car maintenance, which it doesn't.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to marco100 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (133) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community