Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (19) |
Author: Goofyhoofy 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84349 
Subject: Re: Iran selects Mojtaba Khamenei
Date: 03/10/26 7:06 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 20
I think you might just be assigning the pastor/devil roles to match your political preferences, rather than any actual theological basis....

Sidebar story. I served on two juries in Chicago a cojple of decades ago. Small cases, a trucking business owner accusing a union guy of intimidation, a slip-and-fall case against a small retailer. Both two days of “court’ followed by an hour or two in the jury room. Disagreements, eventual agreement, verdict, go home.

A friend of mine got an invitation in the mail, complained to me, I said, “aw go ahead. It’s not bad. Even a little different. You’ll enjoy it.” His experience was different, but not in a good way. Case, he says, was open and shut. Eleven on thbe jury thought so and voted so on the first ballot. One holdout. Why? “She looked at the defendent and decided he couldn’t have done it, he was just too nice a boy.” Argumentation. “I’m not concerned with what I heard, I just know. I prayed on it, and I’m convinced.”

Two days in the jury room, foreman *(my friend) asked for a hearing with the judge, where he said “We have one juror who will not consider the evidence. She just “‘has a feeling.’” He did not tell the judge which way the jury was going, just that it was an 11-1 hang. The judge brought the jury back in, told them to consider the evidence, back the the jury room, no change.

Hung jury. Time wasted, court resources wasted, endless aggravation amongst the jurors. The case was retried some months later. Instant conviction.

That’s the way it is with some people: “facts don’t matter”. They just “know” somehow, and the world must be shifted to conform to their feelings. Facts bounce off them like a Michael Jordan dribbled basketball.


At first I was surprised. Now I’m not.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Goofyhoofy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (19) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community