Post #42087 by onepoorguy on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

Sure, but I bet it’s a whole lot more expensive to burn down a house and then have to rebuild it than it is to remodel a room or two.

True. Which makes it even more foolish.

Plus, if the Dems get a trifecta in 2028, they could always say "since we're rebuilding, I never liked the layout of the den"... The Right would be giving them the opportunity to change stuff they really may not like.

Which, I assume, is why the APA exists. To prevent burning and remodeling on a whim, creating chaos and inconsistency.

I think a strengthening of the APA is in order to prevent either side from burning it all down, to assure some continuity across administrations.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.