Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (133) |
Author: marco100   😊 😞
Number: of 84364 
Subject: Re: The Affordability Tour Kicks Off
Date: 12/18/25 9:44 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
In other words, albaby, the Left (including SEIU, teacher's unions, and so forth) are total hypocrites. They like the current system the way it is just fine, because they find it benefits them.

As does the Democrat party which gets so much of its voters and funds from these unions and Progressives who support them.

But in the end it will all boil down to 1) what form of rationing our society chooses to allocate health care and health care dollars and what mix of public/private we are left with after the dust clears; 2) whether or not as a whole society is willing to try to establish more rational economic and behavioral incentives.

For example, health care premiums provided by employers are generally tax deductible. That's an irrational economic incentive, a relic of wage & price controls from about the World War II era. Maybe gradually that could be changed over say a 10 or 20 year period so it won't be too much of a shock to the system.

Another irrationality of the current system, an obvious one, is that there is no means-testing for ACA subsidies.

So an early retiree with millions in investments can manage their AGI so as to be eligible for subsidies which in effect are paid for by other people with a lot less assets. It's great for them but it's inequitable and economically irrational.

There are probably numerous other examples.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to marco100 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (133) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community