Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (27) |
Author: albaby1 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 55834 
Subject: Re: ICE Shooting in Dallas
Date: 09/25/2025 12:07 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
After we get the money the procedure is changed to apply a code section for arrivals to those found within the borders that allows indefinite detention? Before that were we allowing a bond hearing and they could get out? Now that we have the money we have indefinite detention centers? Why are we violating the law AFTER we got money appropriated, but not before? Or were we violating a different law before?

There's no mention of a rational given for the change in sections, so I assume none was given? You would think they'd use boilerplate and choose some issue to accuse them of that fits the section. Did they just arbitrarily refile on everyone being held to change the Code section, or was it only new detainees?


All good questions. ICE would certainly claim that they're not violating the law - that's something that will need to be hashed out in court. I don't think they'll hide that they've changed their interpretation of the code provisions. That's something that happens with new Administrations. Different department heads will have different ideas of what the current law requires, and they'll pursue different policies based on those interpretations.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (27) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds