Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (63) |
Author: Said   😊 😞
Number: of 21943 
Subject: Re: Buybacks have begun
Date: 03/07/26 4:59 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 12
It is hard to see how a $1.1 trillion conglomerate dedicated to growing by shrewd acquisitions can prosper when there are only 220 companies with market caps over $100b, or 110 US companies, Berkshire’s usual hunting ground.

It´s all about Warren´s/Charlie´s mantra "buy great companies at decent prices" (or similar; my bad memory), whether that be whole companies or shares thereof.

Yes, apparently since years Warren doesn´t see opportunities to really move the needle meaningfully for a company of Berkshire´s size --- not surprising in an environment of since so many years markets only rising and getting more expensive.

But I see it historically, always have to think on Warren´s "I feel like an oversexed guy on an Island", replaced later by "... in a whore house". Maybe somebody can help me out with the dates he said that. For me it means nothing is going up forever and reminds me on what always differentiated Warren from mere mortals: Infinite patience.

- 1950-1965 the S&P went up for a full 16 years
- 1966-1981 up and down, effectively nowhere for the next 16 years
- 1982-2000 up again in a straight line for another 18 years
- 2001-2013 was required, 13 years, to reach that level again and to continue to rise from thereon --- with big swings during those 13 years, opportunities to deploy mountains of cash
- 2013-2025 up again for 13 years in a nearly straight line
- ???

I see no reason why these secular cycles shouldn´t apply any longer***.

If they do still apply it´s likely that a secular bear cycle is coming (or as I suspect already started). Then Warren/Abel probably will have many years with opportunities to invest even that huge cash hoard in a way which will ensure Berkshire´s profitability for some more decades (though I am not sure whether that will still benefit me or only my heirs :)

It´s a longterm game and nobody is better in that than Warren - and hopefully his students at the HQ. I am therefore willing to be a little patient myself and to give them some more years instead of becoming impatient and saying "Goodbye" to Berkshire at maybe exactly the wrong point in time.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Said here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 21,448 posts about Berkshire Hathaway. The article-length ones it recommended most:
BRK: Why Not XOM? · 62 recs · 2024
Second quarter comments · 60 recs · 2023
Berkshire's Profit Contributors · 57 recs · 2023
Summary of 2Q 2026 · 54 recs · 2026
3Q Summary · 53 recs · 2024
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (63) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community