Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (26) |
Author: onepoorguy 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84350 
Subject: Re: ?MedicareForAll is a policy from decades ago"
Date: 08/29/26 3:31 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
For some reason, full bore proponents of Free Healthcare never, ever, ever want to talk about that stuff. Avoid it like the plague, in fact.

I'll talk about it.

Heck, back when I was a Republican, that was one of my paranoid fears. In fact, I thought the government should do that if we (government) are paying for care. "If I'm paying your medical, no smoking for you!".

If the Fool had saved all those old discussions, you could go back 20 years and look them up.

However, no system in the world operates that way. There is zero reason to believe one we set up here would. In fact, you could NEVER sell the public if that was included. Similarly, you could never sell the public on the idea that they can't choose their own doctor. So your assurance that will never happen is that we live in a democracy where the public will never stand for it. No politician would advocate that if he/she wanted to get elected ever again, and it would be a bludgeon wielded by opponents in elections. It would be a landslide of opposition.

Though, as an aside, with insurance, you already are limited. Your doctor has to be in-network, or you can't get coverage to see him/her. I had to change doctors when I retired because of that. Ironically, in two years when I go on Medicare, if she's still practicing I could go back to her (she takes Medicare).

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to onepoorguy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (26) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community