Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (54) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: 2 more Chinese bioterror arrests
Date: 11/07/25 9:37 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 9
What’s hilarious is that you’re all convinced now that their smuggling is for some altruistic purpose!

No, we're not. They clearly broke the rules, and we agree they probably knew what they were doing. It's illegal to impo...I mean, smuggle animals without following the rules.

But the animal in question is harmless, and already well-established in the wild in the United States. While they certainly did something wrong, it also certainly was neither bioterrorism or smuggling in a bioweapon.

And btw it was wordplay from the start…just as I said upthread.

It's not mere wordplay. People's feeds get filled with stuff like this - things that start with an actual event or fact, but then get layered with misconceptions or outright falsehoods. Because the kernel of the story is true, then people believe that the extra layers are true. And the accumulation of all those extra layers of false information ends up giving people some very wrong ideas about what's actually going on in the world.

So it's important to realize that while these folks were definitely breaking the rules that prohibit bringing in live animals (certain exceptions not relevant here), they were not engaging in bioterrorism or bringing in a bioweapon. Illegal, very likely criminal - but not terrorism, not part of an effort to attack the U.S. or cause widespread harm.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (54) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community