Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) |
Author: Goofyhoofy 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84359 
Subject: Re: Praise the Google Jockey
Date: 04/05/24 12:30 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
The Perotistas and Buchananites were warning about going all in on "free trade" not just with Mexico wut especially China. And yeah - like now as back then the Google Jockey will have "links" and man in those days the Google Jockey Caucus lectured the rest of us on how it'll be fine.

You understand it was Reagan and Republicans who changed the course of American trade policy in the 80’s, complaining about unions (who were opposed) and high manufacturing costs and the like. Democrats came to accept it after being pushed (to their own detriment), but make no mistake, this was a freeee market initiative embraces by the Libertarian think tanks and Reagan Republicans.

Now it’s Republicans, or at least Trumpites complaining about it, even though it’s a policy they set in motion 40 years ago. How ironic.

 Reagan, however adhered to his free trade stance, and was the primary proponent of 
the Free Trade Agreement with Canada, which evolved into the North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA). He also signed, reluctantly, trade legislation designed to open foreign
markets to U.S. goods.

reaganlibrary.gov - Reagan presidency

You think Democrats, who are heavily supported by unions, wanted jobs to move to Mexico and Canada? Don’t make me laugh. But Republicans built it to such a fever pitch that even Clinton had little choice but to sign the NAFTA agreement.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Goofyhoofy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community