Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (318) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: Let’s See If This Pans Out for Putin
Date: 08/21/25 2:25 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
You have consistently asserted that the reason Ukraine can't win on their present course was that they lack the guns, money and dudes to drive out the Russians. Throughout the American Revolution, the Continental Army including their French allies also lacked the guns, money and dudes to drive out the British.

Huh? The French were the ones providing the trifecta of dudes, guns and money. You're making my point for me.

The fact that the Continental Army's forces also included the French does not change that.

You mean other than France having significant skin in the game, far more on a relative scale than NATO has today?

Yet they still won, because the British chose to leave after it became in their best interests to do so.

They didn't have a choice. They lost on the battlefield and had 7-8k of their soldiers in American prison camps. They weren't really in charge of the Colonies after that point.

And Russia is only able to hold a modest portion of Ukraine. They're not "holding" the entire country when 80% of the land area and the largest cities (they never got Kyev or Odessa, they lost Kharkiv) are held by the Patrio...I mean, the Ukrainian Army.

Apples/Oranges. When from 2020-2021 did Russia control all of the Ukraine? When was "Russia" - as its government is presently constructed - ever in charge there?

On the economic and diplomatic battlefields - and by forcing the Russians to maintain some of their military forces in defensive posture against any potential NATO threat.

You yourself ruled out the kind of secondary sanctions that would really hurt Putin. You dislike the secondary tariffs but they've forced Russia to further slash the price of oil:
timesnownews.com - India defies US pressure resumes buying russian oil china may face supply squeeze article
New Delhi: India’s state-run refiners have resumed purchases of Russian crude for September and October delivery after a brief pause, lured back by wider discounts, two company officials told Reuters on Wednesday. The move comes just weeks after New Delhi faced sharp criticism from Washington over its Russian oil purchases.

Good. Keep driving the price of Russian oil down to zero.

The French were directly involved in the fighting in and around the continent. The parallels with NATO today simply do not exist.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Dope1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (318) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community