Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12) |
Author: ajm101   😊 😞
Number: of 21944 
Subject: Re: SNOW - hold forever?
Date: 09/25/23 10:40 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
Isn't that a big barrier for Oracle customers to switch to SF so it's unlikely SF will catch up with Oracle?

I work around the space, and I don't get a lot of opportunities where BRK investment discussion and technology overlap.

Snowflake has a number of academic papers floating around, a few of which are quite good (PDFs, view at your own risk)
* event.cwi.nl - Dageville snowflake "The Snowflake Elastic Data Warehouse" (slides from talk accompany paper here, 15721.courses.cs.cmu.edu: PDF document)
* usenix.org - Paper vuppalapati "Building An Elastic Query Engine on Disaggregated Storage"

Migration is tedious but it's one time in nature. In this case you do it to reduce long term costs, which Snowflake does in ways the papers describe. Those papers are accessible but fairly technical, so to summarize it, they optimize storage efficiency (compression in "blob storage", or s3-like systems), adapting established data warehousing techniques to work with that storage architecture, decoupling storage from compute resources, and highly cost efficient compute utilization. To summarize further, they support extremely big data in generic cloud resources very efficiently.

The difficulty in chipping away at ORCL is the depth of integration into things like CRM, ERP, financials, ERM, and so on. I have the impression that the CRM/ERP/et al. data may reside in those system but gets replicated into SNOW and that SNOW runs a lot more data analysis oriented workloads, but I may be wrong. No need to scale up expensive Oracle systems to handle unrelated analytic workloads, and risk license noncompliance or audits, right?

I don't know why BRK has the SNOW position, out of all of their tech adjacent positions. It is a very high valuation and high risk (from disruption, many competitors can emerge in 10-15 years to grow into 20 P/S multiple. But I'd guess it came from the insurance operations, and from analyzing the future market for data, the structural cost advantage, and stickiness or cost to moving data out once they acquired a customer.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to ajm101 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 21,448 posts about Berkshire Hathaway. The article-length ones it recommended most:
BRK: Why Not XOM? · 62 recs · 2024
Second quarter comments · 60 recs · 2023
Berkshire's Profit Contributors · 57 recs · 2023
Summary of 2Q 2026 · 54 recs · 2026
3Q Summary · 53 recs · 2024
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community