Post #10538 by onepoorguy on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 5

They don’t get to claim they represent the voters of Colorado.

And they aren't.

They're questioning whether Trump is Constitutionally qualified. That's not about representing voters, that's about the requirements imposed by the Constitution. Just as for 1poorkid, they could (and should) rule that she isn't qualified because she's only 27. That's not representing voters, and doesn't pretend to be. It's questioning meeting the qualification criteria, which in this case includes not engaging in (or providing aid to) insurrection against this country.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.