Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13) |
Author: eashworth   😊 😞
Number: of 77803 
Subject: Re: NAR lawsuit
Date: 10/31/23 7:02 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
Here's a brief passage from a New York Times article on the case. Note that damages are subject to being tripled to over $5 billion. Jury deliberated less than 3 hours.

Under a N.A.R. rule, a home seller is required to pay commissions to the agent representing the buyer, which sellers claimed forced them to pay excessive fees to the agents. The home sellers said the brokerages collaborated with N.A.R. to enforce what is called the 'cooperative compensation rule.'

But under the verdict, the sellers would no longer be required to pay their buyers' agents, and agents would be free to set their own commission rates, which could be slashed in half or less. For example, a home seller with a $1 million home can now pay as much as $60,000 in agent commissions ' $30,000 to their agent and $30,000 to the buyers' agent.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/31/realestate/nar-...
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds