Post #41862 by bighairymike on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (112)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

Wouldn't have been any different if the bill had passed. The bill didn't restrict Trump (or any future President) from doing anything, and didn't lock in 5K/day as permitted or authorized or anything. - albaby

Then what purpose was served by having the 5,000 / day provisions in the bill at all?

The only difference would have been that there would be more ICE agents, more detention space, and more court throughput.- albaby

Great, I am all for these elements. So again, why was the 5,000 / day wording in the bill in the first place?

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (112)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.