Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7) |
Author: mungofitch 🐝🐝🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 4460 
Subject: Re: Jill Schlesinger looks at Social Security
Date: 06/24/25 3:07 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 35
Interesting on how countries differ.

The Canadian pension system was pay-as-you-go (current payments funded from current employment taxes) until the 1990s, when it became quite clear that that wasn't going to work out long term: it was going to be untenable unless something changed. Sound familiar?

I guess it had been clear for a while, but they did act. Contribution rates were 1.8% of payroll from inception of the system until 1986: 1.8% for the employee, plus 1.8% for the employer, total 3.6%. The rates rose slowly for a few years 1987-1996 at 2.8% each, then rose quickly 1997-2003 to 4.95% each. The extra contributions were enough to start building a pension fund. The contribution rate was steady at that level for 16 years, but was bumped up again 2019-2023 to 5.95% each where it is now holding steady. i.e., a "tax wedge" of about 12% for pensions alone.

The fund is now up to something like C$700bn, termed a "strong surplus" by the actuaries, so current forecasts are that it won't go broke...it's expected to be more that fully funded to at least the 2090s.

If there is a lesson, perhaps it's that sometimes you just gotta raise taxes. Just suck it up.

The US motto is "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness". Canada's is a more boring "peace, order, and good government".

Jim
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to mungofitch here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,454 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community